home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- THE ROSWELL FILM FOOTAGE
-
- By Philip Mantle : Director Of Investigations : British UFO Research
- Association.
-
- Much has already been written about the UFO crash at Roswell in July of
- l947, so I won't go over old ground. More recently a great deal has
- also been written about the Roswell film footage currently in
- possession of Mr. Ray Santilli, Managing Director of The Merlin Group
- in London. To verify my involvement with Ray Santilli and the film in
- question I would like to take this opportunity to put the facts
- straight.
-
- MAKING CONTACT WITH RAY SANTILLI.
-
- I was first contacted by Ray Santilli almost two years ago when he
- discussed with me the possibility of putting together a UFO documentary
- video. For those that don't know, The Merlin Group has put together a
- number of video's on a whole host of different subjects or issued
- overseas video's under license here in the UK. They have never made a
- UFO documentary. They have also issued music tapes and commissioned
- books. For a variety of reasons the planned documentary with Merlin
- never came off but it was during this time that Ray Santilli told me
- the story of the Roswell film footage and how he obtained it.
-
- THE STORY BEGINS.
-
- Santilli claimed that at some point previously (I do not know the date)
- he had flown to the USA to research a documentary on the late Elvis
- Presley. In order to do this he had traced a veteran camerman who was
- one of if not the first person ever to film Elvis live on stage.
- Santilli purchased some archive film of Elvis from the man in question
- and returned to his hotel happy with the film he had obtained. Before
- flying back to England he was telephoned at his hotel by the camerman
- in question who asked him to go and see him before he left as he had
- something even more interesting to show him. Santilli agreed but this
- time it was not film of Elvis but of the UFO crash at Roswell in l947.
- Santilli eventually agreed to purchase the film for cash, the exact
- some on money involved I do not know. Having purchased the film he
- returned with it to England.
-
- After being told this story both on the telephone by Ray Santilli and
- in London in person when I first met him I simply asked him to show it
- to me. Unless he did it would remain nothing more than another
- fanciful story.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- INFORMING OTHERS.
-
- I told Santilli's version of the story about this film to one or two
- of my trusted colleagues in the UK, one of whom is John Spencer, now
- BUFORA's Chairman. I also took the opportunity to brief Walter Andrus,
- International Director of MUFON when he was a speaker at BUFORA's
- conference in Bristol in l993. Both John and Walter asked me to keep
- them informed. I also contacted various Roswell researchers whose
- response was luke warm to say the least.
-
- Santilli on several occasions made appointments for me to view the
- film in London none of which ever materialised. Reasons for this were
- given many of which sounded quite reasonable but I was left with no
- choice but to assume that Santilli's story was nothing more than just
- that, a story.
-
- THE ROSWELL FOOTAGE : A FIRST LOOK.
-
- Over the next year or so I had infrequent contact with Santilli either
- on the telephone or fax machine none of which resulted in me seeing
- any of the film. In early l994 I was about to set to work on writing a
- review of the Roswell movie which stars Kyle Machlaclan and Martin
- Sheen. In the process of doing this I picked up the phone and called
- Santilli completely out of the blue. I asked him once again if he
- still claimed to have this film from Roswell to which he replied "yes,
- but you don't believe me Philip". Once again I repeated my request to
- see the film and again we discussed the possibility of a screening of
- it at Santilli's office in London. After a variety of more phone calls
- and fax messages my wife Sue and I eventually went to Ray Santilli's
- office in London on Friday March 17th, l995.
-
- At this meeting with Santilli he once again told us the story of how he
- obtained the film footage but he did not show us any film in his office.
- Instead I was given a copy of a segment of film which Santilli called
- the "on-site examination footage" to take away and view at my leisure.
-
- I have viewed this section of film over and over again and although it
- is quite poor quality a number of things can be seen. The sequence is
- filmed inside a construction that could be either a tent or a shed of
- some kind. The camera remains in a fixed position in a 'corner' of the
- room. At the far side of the room are two men in white coats in front
- of which is a 'table' of some kind on which lies a figure (presumably
- one of the dead aliens). This figure is partially covered by a light
- coloured sheet of some kind although its head, arms and legs are
- visible. In the foreground is a person dressed in dark clothing with
- his back to the camera. The inside of this place is illuminated by
- what look like gas or oil lamps, or even electric lights.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- The two men in white coats appear to be taking 'tissue samples' of
- some kind whilst the person in dark clothing simply seems to walk
- about doing nothing in particular. The figure or alien on the table
- does not appear to be short nor particular tall either. Not much
- detail can be made out because of the poor quality of the film but its
- large dark eyes can be see without too much difficulty. The film is
- black and white and there is no sound recording to accompany it.
-
- AN INVITATION TO BUFORA's CONFERENCE.
-
- Intriguing though this segment was it really did not serve to do
- anything other than to arouse my interest even more. Whilst in Ray
- Santilli's office I asked him if he would speak at BUFORA's conference
- in Sheffield on August 19 & 20 and show the film and to my surprise he
- agreed to do so. Just a few days after his confirmation as a speaker
- at a conference that was already organised I was telephoned by a
- friend of mine by the name of David Clarke. David is a former BUFORA
- council member and is now a journalist with the Sheffield Star
- newspaper. David was writing a small article on a young man in
- Sheffield who was just starting his involvement with UFO investigations
- and he asked me for a few quotes about the conference so that he could
- give it a plug for me. I told David all about the speakers and the Ray
- Santilli Roswell film which he ran in the Sheffield Star. A few days
- later I was contacted by Whites Press Agency in Sheffield who asked me
- if the article in the Sheffield Star concerning the conference was
- correct. I confirmed that it was and they asked me a few more questions
- before thanking me for my time. The next thing I knew I was receiving
- telephone calls from TV, Radio and newspapers from around the world
- all wanting to know about the Roswell film, Ray Santilli and of course
- the conference. I told them what I could but by and large I passed
- then onto Mr. Santilli himself. This exposure was somewhat premature
- but at least it brought international attention on the film in question.
-
- THE FIRST AUTOPSY.
-
- Eager to see more of the film another appointment was made with Ray
- Santilli for April 28th. Again my wife Sue and I visited Ray at his
- office in London to view another segment of film. This time we were
- shown one of the autopsies. Unlike the previous film this was very
- clear. Again it was in black and white with no sound track. The alien
- is laid on a slab inside what looks like a morgue or should I say
- hospital. The walls are all white etc. The alien is humanoid almost
- human looking with a enlarged abdomen, two arms two legs, but it has
- six digits on each of its hands and feet. There is no hair visible
- anywhere, the head is slightly enlarged but it has a nose, mouth, ears
- (these are lower on the head than a human) and two 'dark eyes'.
- Female genitals are also visible.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- The autopsy begins with the 'dark eyes' being removed. This is in fact
- a kind of a dark covering over the eyes itself. Once removed the
- eyeballs are visible underneath although they are rolled up into the
- head.
-
- The alien's body is cut open and various organs are removed and placed
- in various receptacles. A kind of a 'crystal' or 'mineral' about the
- size of a marble is also removed from the chest cavity. The head is
- cut open and the skull sawn open to gain access to the brain.
-
- The people conducting the autopsy are completely covered in protection
- suits of some kind and unfortunately the faces of these individuals
- are not visible. This autopsy is conducted by two people who appear at
- times to be also writing down the process as they go along. Behind the
- head of the alien is a gap then a wall with a window in. Through this
- window another person can be observed apparently wearing surgical
- clothing, cap, gown, mask etc. Unlike the first piece of film apart
- from a white coat the people were not wearing a surgical mask. As I am
- not qualified to comment on the procedure used in the autopsy nor the
- instruments used I will refrain from doing so. Nor will I comment on
- whether certain other objects in the room such as a telephone and a
- clock were available in l947.
-
- THE SECOND AUTOPSY.
-
- On May 5th, l995, my wife Sue and I along with over 200 others were
- invited to attend another screening of more of the film at the Museum
- of London. We did attend as did Kent Jeffrey from the USA, Roberto
- Pinotti from Italy, Michael Hesemann from Germany along with Reg
- Presley and Colin Andrews to name but a few. Also in attendance were
- representatives from a variety of TV companies from around the world.
-
- After a short reception we were shown into the viewing theatre in which
- another of the autopsies was shown. This time the alien had a damaged
- leg unlike the previous autopsy where the creature was fully intact.
- The procedure was pretty much the same as before but by no means
- exactly the same. Again I will not comment on the medical procedures
- used nor artifacts in the autopsy room as I am not qualified to do so.
-
- Afterwards opinions seemed to be mixed but many people including
- myself were a little disappointed that more of the film was not shown.
- However, I had now in total viewed something like 40 minutes worth of
- film which was becoming more interesting each time I saw more of it.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- AN OFFER OF ANALYSIS.
-
- In between times on behalf of BUFORA on April 20, l995, I personally
- put a two page proposal to Ray Santilli to outline how we would like
- to conduct the analysis of the film in question. Copies of this
- document were also sent to John Spencer (BUFORA Chairman) and Walter
- Andrus (MUFON International Director) along with Ray Santilli of
- course. Basically it outlined that we would like a copy of all of the
- film in question, a copy of any and all documentation connected to it,
- the serial numbers from all canisters of film, plus one whole canister
- of the actual film itself.
-
- Two companies in England has agreed to undertake the analysis of the
- film Kodak is one the other is Hasan Shah Films. I also requested
- access to the original camerman who had taken the film. Ray Santilli
- has agreed in principle to our proposals but they have yet to be put
- into practice.
-
- THE RUMOURS.
-
- A great many rumours have circulated and are still circulating about
- this film. Some of these I can not verify or deny but others I can.
- The first concerns Reg Presley. Reg is the lead singer with the
- sixties pop group The Troggs and he is well known in the UK for his
- interest in UFO's and crop circles. One of the rumors is that Reg is a
- financial backer of Ray Santilli and that his only involvement in this
- matter is for publicity purposes. I have spoken with Reg about these
- rumors and he denies them all stating that he has no financial stake
- in the film and he certainly does not require any publicity. His
- motives are purely out of interest in the UFO subject. Another rumor
- is that the film in question was offered to UFO researcher Jacques
- Vallee in Brazil some years ago. I wrote to Jacques to question this
- rumor and in a letter to me dated 1 May l995 he states " The rumour
- you heard about me, Brazil and the alleged Roswell film is just that,
- a rumor. I have never made any such statement. I have been told that
- the rumour was being spread by someone named Dan Smith, but I don't
- know whether he invented it, or was simply repeating it."
-
- Another version of this same rumour is that the film was offered to the
- American TV show 'Unsolved Mysteries' who automatically confirmed that
- it was a South American 'B' movie of some kind. On May 5th, l995 I
- spoke with the Unsolved Mysteries show in the USA who have once again
- denied this rumor. Other rumors that I personally am involved with the
- hoaxing of this film in order to gain publicity for BUFORA's conference
- and/or the Roswell movie are just as ridiculous as any of the others I
- have heard. I dare say that there are many more rumors circulating that
- have not yet come to my attention.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- More recent rumors circulating on the Internet have come from Graham
- Birdsall editor of Quest International's UFO magazine. Birdsall just
- about gets everything wrong. For example he states that I released
- details of the film footage to the Press Association. Wrong, I released
- details to David Clarke as outlined above. He also goes on to say that
- I never informed any UFO researchers from around the world about the
- film. Again wrong.
-
- In l993 I informed my colleagues at BUFORA including Jenny Randles and
- John Spencer plus I also informed Walter Andrus, MUFON's International
- Director. Added to this I also sent details in l994 to Roswell
- researcher and author Kevin Randle plus USA researchers Don Ecker and
- Vicki Cooper. Colleagues at UFO Norway were also informed. Birdsall,
- in his Internet 'facts' even quotes the wrong code number on the
- original Roswell 16mm film. He describes it as 'KODA with a black
- solid triangle and a black solid circle'. It is in fact 'KODA with a
- black solid triangle and a black solid square'. Birdsall also goes on
- about zoom lenses being used in the autopsy sequence shown in London.
- Having viewed the film myself only once I am unable to remember any
- such.
-
- Please be aware at this point that Birdsall has not viewed any of the
- film. Birdsall also goes on to state that Ray Santilli's company is in
- receivership and that myself and/or BUFORA have promoted the film
- footage as genuine. For his and everyone else's information Ray
- Santilli's company is not in receivership and at no time have I or
- anyone else at BUFORA promoted the film footage as genuine. There has
- been some misleading press statements attributed to me but if people
- wish to believe these that is up to them. A longer reply to Birdsall
- from myself has been posted on the Internet.
-
- THE SAN MARINO CONFERENCE.
-
- In between all of this the first stills from the footage were shown by
- myself with the permission of Ray Santilli at a UFO conference on May
- 19 & 20 held in the Republic of San Marino. Sponsored by the San Marino
- government and organised by the Italian group Centro Ufologico
- Nazionale (CUN) . Seven stills were used from the second autopsy
- sequence. The showing of these stills was restricted to members of the
- CUN and representatives of the San Marino government. I have also been
- asked to speak about this film in France, Germany and Brazil.
- invitations which I will probably accept, time and work allowing.
-
- In my opinion BUFORA and myself have approached this whole issue in an
- unbiased manner and have treated all parties concerned correctly and
- professionally. We have put to Ray Santilli a sound and reasonable
- plan to undertake the analysis of the film and if he agrees to
- cooperate then we may well begin to get to the bottom of the matter.
- We have attempted to follow up any rumors that could at least be
- feasible but to date (29.5.95) none of them have yet stood up to
- scrutiny.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- We will of course continue to do this and offer our full cooperation to
- Ray Santilli and any serious professionals or researchers who can
- offer sensible ideas on how to further analyse the Roswell film footage.
-
- For the record I would like to state here and now that I do have any
- opinions one way or the other regarding this film footage. I trust
- that Ray Santilli will eventually cooperate with BUFORA and allow the
- film to be analysed and then and only then will we truly start to get
- to the bottom of things. Until such a time I remain firmly on the
- fence and I do not know if the film is genuine of fake.
-
- BUFORA COUNCIL.
-
- Members of the Bufora Council and the Witness Support Group had the
- opportunity to view one of the autopsy segments on Saturday June 3rd
- at a meeting in London. The viewing of this film was arranged by
- myself in cooperation with Ray Santilli. This was the first opportunity
- for others at BUFORA to view the film and a number of very positive
- ideas were put forward with regards to its analysis which we hope to
- action in the future.
-
-